But how have personal attitudes and responsibilities changed over the same time? Note 2 to entry: Compliance obligations can arise from mandatory requirements, such as applicable laws and regulations, or voluntary commitments, such as organizational and industry standards, contractual relationships, codes of practice and agreements with community groups or non-governmental organizations. How many documents are required? Some of the biggest certification bodies announced that they will stop issuing new certificates according to the old version by September 2016. The transition is a great opportunity to reconsider the scope of your system and to define its boundaries more precisely. Is this too much to write? We go family-style on a big platter of environmental issues. Besides aligning your old procedures with the new clause numbers, you should also consider improving your existing documentation.
This does not require a detailed life cycle assessment; thinking carefully about the life cycle stages that can be controlled or influenced by the organization is sufficient. If you get your certificate according to the 2004 revision after September 15, 2015, you will have three years to transition to the new version. For an overview of the changes, see this infographic:. Documented information is the new term, and it refers to both procedures and records. To learn how to perform each of these 12 steps, download the free white paper.
Consistent with the organization's environmental policy, the intended outcomes of an environmental management system include: · enhancement of environmental performance; · fulfilment of compliance obligations; · achievement of environmental objectives. By providing information, an organization can potentially prevent or mitigate adverse environmental impacts during these life cycle stages. The changes are not related to the techniques for conducting them, but rather to changes in the input elements of the management review and requirements to be audited during the internal audit. The requirements for preventive actions do not exist anymore preventive actions basically became a part of the risk assessment process , so you can decide whether to delete that procedure or not. If you already listed all the statutory, regulatory, and contractual requirements according to the old clause 4. After the assessment of risks and opportunities, there should also be some plans for addressing them. The new version requires better control of the processes, including operating criteria and implementing controls of processes according to the criteria.
Of course, this is only in theory. Note 2 to entry: Uncertainty is the state, even partial, of deficiency of information related to, understanding or knowledge of, an event, its consequence, or likelihood. The organization can consider those stages in the life cycle over which it has the greatest control or influence as these may offer the greatest opportunity to reduce resource use and minimize pollution or waste. Transition steps This is my proposition on what steps should be taken, and their order, for a successful transition to the 2015 version of the standard: 1 Define context of the organization. It concerns not only environmental aspects, but also other parts of the system such as context of the organization and compliance obligations.
Do these documents cover all aspects of environmental management? The life cycle stages that are applicable will vary depending on the activity, product or service. The transition is a great chance to reevaluate your environmental aspects. Well, this is not quite necessary — although the 2015 revision did bring some changes, they are not so drastic. The organization considers the extent of control or influence that it can exert over activities, products and services considering a life cycle perspective. If you became certified before September 15, 2015, you will have your surveillance audits according to the 2004 revision, but your recertification audit will be conducted according to the 2015 revision. Requirements became much stricter in the 2015 revision, especially regarding the above-mentioned environmental performance, but also the internal audit and the management review need to be aligned with the new version of the standard. .
What is a life cycle? If done properly, this will give you an overall picture of your system and tell you what needs to be improved. Why include life cycle perspective? A requirement for complying with statutory and regulatory requirements existed in the previous version, but now there are also interested parties and their needs and expectations to be observed as compliance obligations. Written in an easy-to-follow format, reading this book means you will never struggle with your Environmental Management System again! Click here to download a white paper with more detailed information on the most common ways for structuring and implementing mandatory documents and records. The new version also requires you to consider foreseeable emergency situations and a lifecycle perspective of your products and services during the identification and evaluation of environmental aspects. There is now a lot of emphasis on establishing environmental performance measuring and monitoring. . .
. . . . . .
. . . . . .